Technical Executive Summary
We propose integrating a federated system architecture that decomposes your operational bottlenecks through four interconnected technical modules. This system replaces fixed human capital expenditure with elastic, API-driven services while constructing a quantum-ready data fabric that enables real-time adaptive risk modeling for Zi-US and beyond.
Technical Analysis
Identified Technical Debt Patterns
Systemic constraints in the current infrastructure create compounding inefficiencies across the organization:
| Current State | Technical Limitation | Business Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Siloed Product Teams | Fragmented CI/CD pipelines | Slow feature deployment (avg. 3-4 month cycles) |
| Legacy Audit Systems | Manual SOX/SOC2 compliance checks | 40% auditor time spent on data aggregation |
| Traditional Data Warehouses | Batch ETL processes | Risk models updated monthly, not real-time |
| Fixed R&D Budget | Cannot fund quantum exploration | Zero quantum advantage in pricing models |
| Vendor Sprawl | 15+ disconnected SaaS tools | $2.3M annual integration maintenance |
Core Technical Hypothesis
Zi-US's innovation velocity is constrained not by vision but by architectural inertia. Each new product requires re-engineering entire data pipelines. Our solution provides composable infrastructure that treats operations as microservices.
The Zi Stack Architecture
Technical Specification
API Architecture: GraphQL Federation with gRPC microservices
Event Sourcing: Kafka clusters for audit trail (immutable ledger)
Container Orchestration: Kubernetes operators for each "expertise pod"
Example Deployment Manifest
# Example Deployment Manifest for Audit Microservice
apiVersion: zi.us/v2
kind: ExpertisePod
metadata:
name: zi-us-soc2-compliance-auditor
spec:
resourceProfile: senior-auditor-llm-enhanced
availability: "3d/wk"
integrations:
- target: ZI_US_SAP_ERP
connector: odbc-gateway-encrypted
- target: ZI_US_SALESFORCE
connector: oauth2-proxy
complianceRules:
- rule: pci-dss-automated-checks
schedule: "0 */4 * * *"
- rule: sox-control-testing
trigger: monthly-close
consoleDashboard: /zi-us/audit/real-time-controls
Technical Benefit
Reduces audit cycle time from 3 weeks to 4 days through automated evidence collection and AI-powered anomaly detection.
Research Pipeline Architecture
1. Problem Decomposition Layer:
- Converts business problems to Hamiltonian formulations
2. Hybrid Quantum-Classical Scheduler:
- Routes problems to appropriate compute backend:
* Qiskit Runtime (IBM Q) for combinatorial optimization
* Pennylane (Rigetti) for Monte Carlo simulations
* Custom CUDA kernels for classical preprocessing
3. Algorithm Versioning System:
- Git-like system for quantum circuits with regression testing
Quantum-Enhanced Risk Prediction Algorithm
# Quantum-Enhanced Claim Prediction Algorithm
class QuantumFraudDetector:
def __init__(self, claim_history):
self.qpu_backend = zi.space.get_optimal_backend(
problem_type='classification',
qubits_required=127,
error_tolerance=1e-3
)
def build_feature_map(self):
# Encode 50+ risk factors into quantum state
return QAOAFeatureMap(
entanglement='full',
reps=3,
parameter_shift=True
)
def predict_claim_risk(self, traveler_data):
# Hybrid quantum-classical inference
classical_features = self.preprocess(data)
quantum_circuit = self.build_circuit(classical_features)
# Execute on quantum cloud fabric
result = self.qpu_backend.run(
circuit=quantum_circuit,
shots=10000,
optimization_level=3
)
# Post-process with classical NN
return self.neural_network(result.probabilities)
Migration Architecture
Phase 1: Edge Processing Layer
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Zi-US On-Prem (zi-us.store hardware) │
│ • Quantum-safe encryption gateways │
│ • FPGA accelerators for real-time ETL │
│ • Local inference for latency-sensitive ops │
└───────────────────┬─────────────────────────┘
│ TLS 1.3 + Quantum Key Dist.
▼
Phase 2: Hybrid Processing Layer
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ zi-us.cloud Region: us-east-quantum │
│ • Classical: 1000+ vCPU Kubernetes cluster │
│ • Quantum: IBM Q System One + Rigetti Aspen │
│ • Storage: Ceph cluster with 3-way replica │
└───────────────────┬─────────────────────────┘
│ GraphQL Federation
▼
Phase 3: Specialized Processing
├── Risk Modeling Partition (GPU-optimized)
├── Customer 360° Partition (Graph database)
└── Compliance Partition (Immutable ledger)
Data Transformation Pipeline
-- Zero-downtime migration of policy database
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW zi_us_policies_quantum_ready
WITH (engine = 'zi_quantum_hybrid') AS
SELECT
policy_id,
-- Classical fields remain
premium,
coverage,
-- Quantum-encoded risk vector
quantum_encode(risk_factors) AS q_risk_vector,
-- Temporal graph relationships
TRAVERSE claim_history USING quantum_walk
FROM zi_us_legacy.policies
WHERE migrate_status = 'pending'
OPTIMIZE USING quantum_annealing(timeout='24h');
Technical Specifications for On-Prem Deployment
Standard Node (SIN-3000):
• 2x Intel Xeon Max Series (CPU + GPU)
• 1x IonQ Aria QPU Co-processor
• 400GbE Quantum Network Interface
• PCIe 5.0 with CXL 2.0 support
• FIPS 140-3 Level 3 HSM
Installation Protocol:
1. Quantum-safe network tunnel establishment
2. Hardware attestation via TPM 2.0
3. Air-gapped key exchange ceremony
4. Continuous hardware telemetry to zi-us.cloud
Technical Integration Roadmap
Week 1-4: Deploy Cöhr Console + 1 Expertise Pod
• Install GraphQL gateway in Zi-US AWS VPC
• Establish bi-directional sync with JIRA/ServiceNow
• Onboard 2 pilot teams
Week 5-12: Initial Data Migration
• Deploy 2 SIN-3000 nodes at primary DC
• Migrate 10TB of policy data to quantum fabric
Target: 200% faster audit cycles, $450K quarterly savings
• Establish zi-us.space research pod with University of Michigan
• Train 3 custom algorithms on Zi-US historical data
• Implement real-time pricing engine for 10% of portfolio
Target: 12% improvement in loss ratio through quantum pricing
• Complete migration of all relevant data stores
• Deploy 15+ Expertise Pods across compliance, actuarial, CX
• Achieve full quantum-classical hybrid workflow automation
Target: $8.2M annual run-rate savings + 2 patent filings
Security & Compliance Architecture
Zero-Trust Implementation
- SPIFFE/SPIRE for service identity across hybrid cloud
- Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) for all inter-DC links
- Confidential Computing via Intel SGX enclaves
- Immutable audit trail using Tendermint consensus
Compliance Automation
class AutomatedSOC2Compliance:
def continuous_monitoring(self):
# Real-time compliance checking
controls = [
CC6.1: self.check_access_logs(),
CC7.1: self.verify_encryption_at_rest(),
CC8.1: self.audit_quantum_key_rotation()
]
# Autonomous evidence collection
return ComplianceReport(
framework="SOC2 Type II",
status=self.zi_blockchain.submit_evidence(controls),
auditor_access="real-time via Cöhr Console"
)
Technical Team & Support Structure
24/7 NOC/SOC Integration
- Direct integration with existing Splunk/SIEM
- 15-minute SLA for critical issues
- Dedicated Site Reliability Engineers per expertise pod
- PhD-level quantum algorithm support on-call
Team Composition for Zi-US Engagement
Technical Success Metrics
KPIs for Phase 1
Quantum-Specific Metrics
Schedule a Technical Deep-Dive
We have built this architecture specifically for organizations facing the dual challenge of modernization and quantum readiness.
Proposed Next Steps
| Step | Description | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Architecture Review | Workshop with your infrastructure team to map integration points | 4 hours |
| Proof of Concept | Limited deployment of Cöhr Console + Quantum risk scoring for 1,000 policies | 30 days |
| Security Audit | Joint review with your CISO team of our zero-trust implementation | 1 week |
Technical Resources Provided
- Full API documentation (OpenAPI 3.0)
- Threat model documentation
- Reference implementations for workflows
- Performance benchmark reports